Boban Velickovic (Université de Paris)
Mini-course on combinatorial L-forcingLet us say we are given an $L_{\kappa,\omega}$-theory T (for some uncountable $\kappa$). We would like to know if we can add a model of T by some nice forcing (proper, semiproper, SSP, etc).
If you allow arbitrary forcing the answer is well-known: player 2 has a winning strategy in the consistency game.
I would like to have an ‘algorithm’ that searches for a nice poset doing this, in particular without collapsing $\omega_1$. As you can guess this is inspired by the Aspero-Schindler result, but also most classical applications of forcing axioms can be seen as adding models for such theories.
The ultimate goal would be to merge forcing axioms with the study of determinacy.
James Cummings (Carnegie Mellon University)
Measures on a strong cardinal
We show that it is consistent for the Mitchell order to be linear at a strong cardinal where GCH fails. This is a joint work with Arthur Apter.
The first uncountable cardinal does not easily mend itself to methods inherited from the countable. We know this through a whole list of failures of properties such as compactness and Ramsey theorems. Similarly, the descriptive set theory at this level is very different from the classical descriptive set theory and does not really seem to give as much of an idea of effectiveness. We shall propose to look at the effectiveness at $\aleph_1$ from the point of view of automata theory and generalized decidability. In so doing, we shall introduce new classes of automata and consider MSO of trees.
Todd Eisworth (Ohio University)
On $\clubsuit_{AD}$ and its relatives
We will look at consistency results that complement a recent theorem of Rinot, Shalev, and Todorcevic that instances of the principle $\clubsuit_{AD}$ follow from the Continuum Hypothesis and even weaker assumptions.
Matthew Foreman (University of California, Irvine)
Welch games on larger cardinals
Moti Gitik (Tel Aviv University) On Cohens inside Prikry forcing and a question of Woodin
We show that it is possible to add $\kappa^{+}$-Cohen subsets to $\kappa$ with a Prikry forcing over $\kappa$. This answers a question from a paper by T. Benhamou, Y. Hayut and G.. In order to do this we introduce a strengthening of non-Galvin property of ultrafilters which is shown to be consistent using a single measurable cardinal. This improves a previous result by T. Benhamou, S. Garti and S. Shelah. A situation with extender-based Prikry forcings is examined.
Building on these ideas, we show that starting with a hypermeasurable cardinal it is possible to have the following:
there is a submodel $V’$ of a model $V$ such that $V \models cof(\kappa) = \omega + 2^\kappa > \kappa^{++} + GCH_{<\kappa}$,
$V’ \models (\kappa \text{ is a measurable cardinal and } 2^\kappa = (2^\kappa)^V)$. Such $\kappa$ may be $\aleph_{\omega}$ of $V$ .
This gives an affirmative answer to a question of H. Woodin from the early 90-th.
This is a joint work with Tom Benhamou.
Tanmay Inamdar (Bar Ilan University) From Sierpinski-type colourings to Ulam-type matrices
Ulam matrices were introduced by Ulam in his study of the measure problem. Ulam’s construction applies to all infinite successor cardinals, and later Hajnal extended the construction to apply to some limit cardinals as well. Our main result is that such matrices can also be constructed using walks on ordinals, assuming there is a non-trivial C-sequence. The inspiration is the onto mapping principle of Sierpinski. The results I present are joint work with Assaf Rinot.
We will discuss the smallness of measurable cardinals in ZF. What does it mean to be small, and how small can we go with just a measurable cardinal on our back?
I will present new results on the subject from a recent sequence of three papers with Assaf Rinot and Juris Steprans.
to the notion of coloring number.
Two-cardinal tree properties were first studied by Jech and Magidor in the 1970s and were used to characterize strongly compact and supercompact cardinals. In the 2000s, Weiss formulated the two-cardinal tree properties (I)TP and (I)SP, which capture many of the combinatorial consequences of strong compactness and supercompactness but also consistently hold at small cardinals. Subsequently, Viale and Weiss showed that at $\omega_2$, ISP, the strongest of these principles, is equivalent to the Guessing Model Property (GMP), which has proven to be a very fruitful set theoretic hypothesis. In this talk, we will discuss some recent results concerning these principles and their variants. We will begin by introducing weakenings of the GMP that are equivalent to SP or even further weakenings thereof but still have considerable combinatorial consequences, for instance implying global failures of square. Then, motivated by the question as to whether (I)TP at a cardinal $\kappa$ implies the Singular Cardinals Hypothesis (SCH) above $\kappa$, we will discuss the consequences of various related two-cardinal combinatorial principles, including generalized narrow system properties and the non-existence of certain strongly unbounded subadditive functions, on cardinal arithmetic, particularly on SCH and Shelah’s Strong Hypothesis. This is joint work with \v{S}\'{a}rka Stejskalov\'{a}.
Justin Moore (Cornell University)
Higher derived limits and partitions
Recently Bergfalk and Lambie-Hanson showed that in the weakly compact Hechler model, the higher derived limits ${\lim}^n \mathbb{A}$ vanish for all $n$, where $\mathbf{A}$ is a certain inverse system of abelian groups indexed by $\omega^\omega$. We will show that this result can be seen to factor into a purely set theoretic Partition Hypothesis concerning finite powers of $\omega^\omega$ and
a lemma which is purely algebraic. The Partition Hypothesis holds in the weakly compact Hechler model and the algebraic lemma is true in ZFC. This is joint work with Bannister, Bergfalk, and Todorcevic.
Sandra Müller (TU Wien)
Inner Models, Determinacy, and Sealing
Ralf Schindler (Universität Münster)
Partitioning $\mathbb{R}^3$ into circles of radius 1.
In ZFC, $\mathbb R^3$ can be partitioned into pairwise disjoint circles of radius 1. We show that the same is true in the Cohen-Halpern-Levy model. Questions about the transcendence degree of the reals in forcing extensions over various somewhat smaller fields come into play. This is joint work with my student Azul Fatalini.
Farmer Schlutzenberg (Universität Münster)
The extent of determinacy in $\omega$-small mice
Assuming large cardinals, $M_\omega$ denotes the canonical proper class inner model with infinitely many Woodin cardinals. Let $A=R\cap M_\omega$ be the set of reals in $M_\omega$. Then $L(A)$ does not model determinacy. There is an ordinal $\alpha$ such that $L_\alpha(A)$ can be $\Sigma_1$-elementarily embedded into $L(R)$ (hence $L_\alpha(A)$ models determinacy), and there is a wellorder of $A$ which is definable over $L_\alpha(A)$. Rudominer and Steel conjectured that a similar situation holds for many mice lower than $M_\omega$ in the hierarchy. They verified the conjecture or a weaker variant under extra assumptions, but the full conjecture has remained open. We will discuss progress toward a positive resolution of the conjecture. This is joint work with John Steel.
We introduce a framework for studying “reasonable” classifying invariants, more permitting than “classification by countable structures”.
This framework respects the intuitions and results about classifications by countable structures, and allows for equivalence relations such as $E_1$ and $E_1^+$ to be “reasonably classifiable” as well. In this framework we show that $E_1$ has classifying invariants which are $\kappa$-sequences of $E_0$-classes for $\kappa=\mathfrak{b}$, and it does not have such classifying invariants if $\kappa<\mathbf{add}(\mathcal{
The result relies on analysing the tail intersection model $\bigcap_{n<\omega}V[c_n,c_{n+
Saharon Shelah (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem)
Corrected Iterations
Dima Sinapova (University of Illinois at Chicago)
Prikry sequences and square properties
The weak Kurepa hypothesis at $\omega_1$, $\mathsf{wKH}(\omega_1)$, states that there exists a tree of size and height $\omega_1$ which has at least $\omega_2$ cofinal branches.
In the first part of the talk we will focus on $\neg\mathsf{wKH}(\omega_1)$ and its connection to the Guessing Model Property at $\omega_2$, $\mathsf{GMP}(\omega_2)$, which was introduced by Viale and Weiss. The first — more common — variant of $\mathsf{GMP}(\omega_2)$ states that there are stationarily many $\omega_1$-guessing models (in some $H(\theta)$), where $\omega_1$-guessing refers to approximations of size $<\!\omega_1$. By a result of Cox and Krueger, this variant of $\mathsf{GMP}(\omega_2)$ implies $\neg\mathsf{wKH}(\omega_1)$. If we weaken $\omega_1$-guessing to $\omega_2$-guessing, i.e.\ if we consider approximations of size $<\!\omega_2$, we get the second variant of $\mathsf{GMP}(\omega_2)$. We show that this variant is consistent with the existence of a Kurepa tree at $\omega_1$. This answers affirmatively the question of Viale who asked whether it is consistent that there are $\omega_2$-guessing models which are not $\omega_1$-guessing.
In the second part of the talk, we will discuss the effect of $\neg\mathsf{wKH}(\omega_1)$ on the cardinal arithmetic. We first review the result that $\neg\mathsf{wKH}(\omega_1) + 2^{\omega}<\aleph_{\omega_1}$ implies $2^\omega=2^{\omega_1}$. Next, we will consider a strengthening of $\neg\mathsf{wKH}(\omega_1)$ which requires that all trees of size $\omega_1$ are special (in the sense of Baumgartner) and thus can have at most $\omega_1$ cofinal branches. This principle is in a sense an “indestructible” version of $\neg\mathsf{wKH}(\omega_1)$ because the “non-weak-Kurepaness” is witnessed by a specialization function, so the tree cannot become a weak Kurepa tree unless cardinals are collapsed. We will show that this strengthening of $\neg\mathsf{wKH}(\omega_1)$ is consistent with $2^\omega=\aleph_{\omega_1}$. We will discuss this result in the context of the Indestructible Guessing Model Property at $\omega_2$, $\mathsf{IGMP}(\omega_2$), and the question whether $\mathsf{IGMP(\omega_2)}$ is consistent with $2^\omega$ having cofinality $\omega_1$.
This is joint work with Chris Lambie-Hanson.
Spencer Unger (University of Toronto) Stationary reflection at the successor of a singular
We compare and contrast recent results getting the consistency of stationary reflection at the successor of a singular cardinal.
Jindrich Zapletal (University of Florida)
Games and chromatic numbers of graphs
Let G be an analytic graph on a Polish space. I provide a determined game characterizing countable list-chromatic number of G. A variation of this game then yields a variation of the countable list-chromatic number of G. It works for example for distance graphs on Euclidean spaces. This is a joint work with David Chodounsky.